|
Lyman, R. Lee:
Lyman, R. Lee, and Michael J. O’Brien
1997 The Concept of Evolution in Early Twentieth-Century Americanist Archeology. In Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary Theory in Archaeological Explanation, edited by C. Michael Barton and Geoffrey A. Clark, pp. 21-48. American Anthropological Association, Archeological Papers No. 7. Washington, D.C.
1998 The Goals of Evolutionary Archaeology: History and Explanation. Current Anthropology 39 (5): 615-652.
1999 Americanist Stratigraphic Excavation and the Measurement of Culture Change. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 6: 55-108.
2000a Chronometers and Units in Early Archaeology and Paleontology. American Antiquity 65 (4): 691-707.
2000b Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 19: 39-74.
2001a On Misconceptions of Evolutionary Archaeology: Confusing Macroevolution and Microevolution. Current Anthropology 42 (3): 408-409.
2001b The Direct Historical Approach, Analogical Reasoning, and Theory in Americanist Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 8 (4): 303-342.
2002 Classification. In Darwin and Archaeology: A Handbook of Key Concepts, edited by John P. Hart and John E. Terrell, pp. 49-68. Bergin and Garvey, Westport.
2003 Cultural Traits: Units of Analysis in Early Twentieth-Century Anthropology. Journal of Anthropological Research 59: 225-250.
2005 Seriation and Cladistics: The Difference Between Anagenetic and Cladogenetic Evolution. In Mapping Our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory, edited by Carl P. Lipo, Michael J. O’Brien, Mark Collard, Stephen J. Shennan pp. 65-88. Aldine, New York.
Lyman, R. Lee, Michael J. O’Brien, and Steve Wolverton
1998 Seriation, Superposition, and Interdigitation: A History of Americanist Graphic Depictions of Culture Change. American Antiquity 63: 239-261.
O’Brien, Michael J., John Darwent, and R. Lee Lyman
2001 Cladistics Is Useful for Reconstructing Archaeological Phylogenies: Palaeoindian Points from the Southeastern United States. Journal of Archaeological Science 28: 1115-1136.
O’Brien, Michael J., and R. Lee Lyman
1999a Meeting Theoretical and Methodological Challenges to the Future of Evolutionary Archaeology. Review of Archaeology 20 (2): 14-22.
1999b Measuring the Flow of Time: The Works of James A. Ford, 1935-1941.
1999c Seriation, Stratigraphy, and Index Fossils: The Backbone of Archaeological Dating. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York.
2000a Applying Evolutionary Archaeology: A Systematic Approach. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
2000b Darwinian Evolutionism Is Applicable to Historical Archaeology. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 4 (1): 71-112.
2000c Evolutionary Archaeology: Reconstructing and Explaining Historical Lineages. In Social Theory in Archaeology, edited by Michael B. Schiffer, pp. 126-142. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
2000d Evolutionary Archaeology and Its Future Directions: A Rejoinder to Kehoe. Review of Archaeology 21: 39-43.
2000e Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 19: 39-74.
2000f Comment on “Population, Culture History, and the Dynamics of Culture Change,” by Stephen Shennan. Current Anthropology 41: 824-826.
2001 Misconceptions of Evolutionary Archaeology: Confusing Macroevolution and Microevolution. Current Anthropology 42: 408-409.
2002a The Epistemological Nature of Archaeological Units. Anthropological Theory 2 (1): 37-56.
2002b Cause. In Darwin and Archaeology: A Handbook of Key Concepts, edited by John P. Hart and John E. Terrell, pp. 49-68. Bergin and Garvey, Westport.
2002c Classification. In Darwin and Archaeology: A Handbook of Key Concepts, edited by John P. Hart and John E. Terrell, pp. 49-68. Bergin and Garvey, Westport.
2002d Evolutionary Archeology: Current Status and Future Prospects. Evolutionary Anthropology 11: 26-36.
2003a Resolving Phylogeny: Evolutionary Archaeology’s Fundamental Issue. In Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory, edited by T. L. VanPool and C. S. VanPool, pp. 115-135. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
2003b Cladistics and Archaeology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
2003c Style, Function, Transmission: Evolutionary Archaeological Perspectives. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
2004 History and Explanation in Archaeology. Anthropological Theory 4 (2): 173-197.
2005 Cultural Phylogenetic Hypotheses: Some Fundamental Issues. In The Evolution of Cultural Diversity: A Phylogenetic Approach, edited by R. Mace, C. Holden, and S.J. Shennan, pp. 87-110. University College London Press, London.
O’Brien, Michael J., R. Lee Lyman, and James W. Cogswell
2002 Culture-historical Units and the Archaeological Record of Southeastern Missouri, 500 B.C.-A.D. 700. In The Woodland Southeast, edited by D. G. Anderson and R. L. Mainfort, Jr., pp. 421-443. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
O’Brien, Michael J., R. Lee Lyman, and John Darwent
2000 l; Time, Space, and Marker Types: James A. Ford’s 1936 Chronology for the Lower Mississippi Valley. Southeastern Archaeology 19 (1): 46-62.
O’Brien, Michael J., R. Lee Lyman, and Robert D. Leonard
1998 Basic Incompatibilities Between Evolutionary and Behavioral Archaeology. American Antiquity 63 (3): 485-498.
2002 Evolutionary Archeology: Current Status and Future Prospects. Evolutionary Anthropology 11 (1): 26-36.
2003 What is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth. American Antiquity 68 (3): 573-580.
O’Brien, Michael J., R. Lee Lyman, Youssef Saab, Elias Saab, John Darwent, and Daniel S. Glover
2002 Two Issues in Archaeological Phylogenetics: Taxon Construction and Outgroup Selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology 215: 133-150.
|